CSP Optimization
NEXT Compression supplied two (2) reciprocating compressors for fuel gas compression as part of the University of Toronto’s CSP Optimization project.
We initially fell short of our own expectations for this project, but the units are running and we continue to resolve operational issues through remote support, site-visits, and third-party involvement. Fixing the issues and standing behind our work is critical, but our committment to learning from our mistakes in the pursuit of excellence is equally, if not more important.
We close out every project with a review that includes analysis of what went well, and what could be improved. Included in this process is an investigation into the why. For example, knowing that our schedule slipped is good context. Understanding why it slipped allows us to identify opportunities to improve our scheduling so that next time we might communicate, anticipate and perhaps prevent.
The table below identifies the causes behind certain obstacles or issues that we faced during this project. Every action discussed has been implemented, and the results have been extremely positive in preventing the recurrence of similar issues moving forward.
| Issue / Why | Action | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Resource load levelling | – Implementation of Primavera (scheduling) – Implementation of Kronos (resource tracking) – Integration of Primavera and Kronos with SAP – Establishment of clearly defined cost-codes (review) |
– Improved ability to track resource commitments and identify and level peak-loading problems |
| Static scheduling resource | See above (Primavera, Kronos, SAP, cost-codes) | – Ability to foresee how loading issues, milestone delays, resource changes will impact prior commitments |
| Insufficient historical project tracking | See above (Primavera, Kronos, SAP, cost-codes) | – Ability to break down and review overruns and overestimations in detail to provide better information for future scheduling and costing. |
| Sales: Reliance on “industry expectations” | – Proposal template updates – Terms and Conditions updates – Detailed customer kick-off with sales, engineering, design, quality after PO |
– Reduced risk of missed deficiencies in review – Better scope definition, clear expectations |
| Design: Competing standards | – SolidWorks as the standard modelling software – AutoCad as the standard PID software – Process standardization – Standard PID/UID layouts |
– Reduced risk of missed deficiencies in review – Better scope definition, clear expectations |
| Engineering: Competing standards | – Standardize specifications – Standardize purchasing procedures |
– Reduced risk of missed deficiencies in review – Better scope definition, clear expectations |
| Manufacturing: Competing processes | – Standardize processes – Engineering and design standards |
– Reduced risk of missed deficiencies in review – Better scope definition, clear expectations |
| Internal: Communication breakdowns | – Company-wide training in Fierce Conversations – Accountability checks – Reinforcement of honesty, transparency |
– Healthy promises – Results delivered – Trust |
| External: Communication breakdowns | – Establish customer expectations – Regular progress reporting with customers |
– Improved communication quality and frequency |
Despite the difficulties, we have learned and become better for this project and we stand by our workmanship. What’s NEXT is a commitment to improving ourselves, our processes, and our packages. We hope the table above demonstrates that commitment.
North AB: (780) 830-1002 | (250) 263-4510
South AB: (403) 820-2657 | (403) 740-9252
Central AB: (403) 820-2657 | (403) 740-9252
North BC: (780) 830-1002 | (250) 263-4510
Corporate HQ / Service: (403) 250-8810
General Inquiries: info@nextcomp.ca
Sales Inquiries: sales@nextcomp.ca
Media Inquiries: media@nextcomp.ca
© 2024 NEXT Compression Corp. All rights reserved.
